Displaying items by tag: CAK

Kenya: Kenya's antitrust authority may force Lafarge to sell some of its interests in the country if the cement maker is found to be flouting domestic competition rules.

The Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) is probing Lafarge's influence on Kenya's cement industry through its 59% stake in Bamburi Cement and 42% shareholding in East Africa Portland Cement Co (EAPCC). The findings will be published in June 2014, according to the CAK's director general Francis Kariuki.

"The current arrangement between Lafarge and EAPCC may be deemed to be an unwarranted concentration of economic power because of the close directorship Lafarge has in EAPCC and Bamburi," said Kariuki. The CAK is investigating pricing in the Kenyan cement industry amid a dispute between shareholders and the government over ownership of EAPCC. Kenya's Treasury holds a 25% stake in the company, while the state-owned National Social Security Fund has 27%.

The government wants Lafarge to dilute its shareholding in EAPCC because no company should hold a 'monopolistic stake' in Kenyan industries, according to Industrialisation and Enterprise Development permanent secretary Wilson Songa. Cross-shareholdings are 'widely recognised to dampen competition,' according to the CAK. Bamburi Cement, in which Lafarge has a controlling stake, owns 12.5% of EAPCC. "Even passive shareholdings change the incentives to set prices, as some of the earnings from sales diverted to a rival are now internalised," said the CAK.

If Lafarge is found to have a monopolistic position in Kenya, the CAK may force Lafarge to sell its stake in one of its businesses in the country, according to Kariuki. Kenyan law also stipulates that anyone found guilty of price fixing faces a US$115,000 fine or a five-year jail term.

Kenya: Lafarge could face penalties by the Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) for suspected price-fixing. CAK has accused Lafarge of possible price-fixing owing to its cross-directorship in East African Portland Cement Company (EAPCC) and Bamburi Cement. Lafarge has a 41.7% stake in EAPCC and a 58.9% stake in Bamburi.

"Cross-shareholdings such as these are widely recognised to dampen competition," said CAK. "Even passive shareholdings change the incentives to set prices, as some of the earnings from sales diverted to a rival are now internalised."

CAK is expected to rule in June 2014 as to whether or not Lafarge is culpable of having 'Unwarranted concentration of economic power.' If found guilty, CAK could force Lafarge to sell off its stake in one of the businesses. The Competition Act (No 12 of 2010) also stipulates that Lafarge directors, if found guilty of price fixing, could be forced to pay up to US$115,000 in fines or serve five-year jail terms.

The report comes four months after the Kenyan government, which together with the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) has a controlling stake of 52.3% in EAPCC, accused Lafarge of attempting to destabilise the cement maker to protect its interests in Bamburi. Lafarge countered that its minority stake in EAPCC is insufficient to exert control over the firm. They added that EAPCC is a genuine competitor of Bamburi Cement and that Lafarge stands to lose if it were to destabilise EAPCC.

The director-general of CAK, Kariuki Wang'ombe, stated that the current shareholding structure is not good for fair business. "Cross-directorship could lead to price-fixing since this creates a position where a competitor is privy to the strategic decisions of another competitor. However, it is not conclusive that there is price-fixing going on," said Wang'ombe.