Displaying items by tag: Cembureau
The 2% and the IPCC
02 October 2013Cement production took an unnecessarily harsh rap from the latest assessment by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The cause? Misleading wording.
In its summary for policymakers from Working Group I contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (WGI AR5), every time CO2 emissions were mentioned, cement was also mentioned. Typically this was along the lines of: "annual CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production". Energy supply or transport industries were not mentioned. Only cement was. Subsequently in some general press reports covering the IPCC report, cement was duly parroted as the major industrial source of CO2 emissions.
Digging into the data revealed that this particular wording derived from one of the data sources that the IPCC used that examined global CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel burning, cement manufacture and gas flaring from 1751 - 2008 from the US Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. Here cement production was grouped along with different type of fossil fuels, such as gas, liquids and solids, and gas flaring. Deeper into the IPCC draft report it was revealed (using this research) that total cumulative emissions between 1750 and 2011 amounted to 365 ± 30 PgC (1 PgC = 1015 grams of carbon), of which only 8 PgC (2%) came from the production of cement.
Undoubtedly the cement industry's carbon emissions are huge but ambiguous wording in a release targeted for policymakers is not helpful.
Thankfully at about the same time as the IPCC made headlines last week European Cement Association, Cembureau, followed the UK's Mineral Products Association (MPA) in releasing its own lobbying document for the industry. This consisted of five parallel routes to lowering emissions related to cement production. Unfortunately Cembureau's press release didn't receive the global media coverage that the IPCC did.
The bottom line is this: cement is essential for modern industrial societies.
With or without climate change caused by human behaviour, we will all need somewhere to live and work. For the moment such structures will be built from cement and concrete. Organisations like Cembureau offer a way forward. Global policymakers should pay attention.
European cement industry presents five routes to a low carbon future
27 September 2013Belgium: CEMBUREAU, the European Cement Association, has published a roadmap, the role of cement in the 2050 low carbon economy, detailing how the cement industry could achieve lower carbon emissions.
The project presents five parallel routes that can each contribute to lowering emissions related to cement production, as well as concrete production. These include methods such as resource efficiency, energy efficiency and carbon sequestration and reuse. These methods have been quantified in the roadmap because they are under the cement sector's control. The other two routes, product efficiency and downstream, look at how cement and concrete can contribute to a low carbon society.
"The cement roadmap is a view into the future. It shows us what is possible and where we find limitations. It is a good basis for future work, a good starting point. We need cooperation, not confrontation, but we also need to push each other to find new ideas, new pathways, towards a more sustainable future," said MEP Karl-Heinz Florenz at the launch event on 25 September 2013.
CEMBUREAU elects new President and Vice President
12 June 2013Europe: Peter Hoddinott has been elected as President of CEMBUREAU for a two-year term at the Association's General Assembly, which was held in Vienna, Austria on 11 June 2013. He has completed his mandate as Vice-President over the past year. He takes over from Ignacio Madridejos. In addition, Daniel Gauthier, a member of the HeidelbergCement managing board, has been elected as Vice-President of CEMBUREAU, also for a two-year term.
Peter Hoddinott has been Executive Vice-President for Energy and Strategic Sourcing at Lafarge since 2012, responsible for worldwide energy strategy and sourcing of Lafarge's externally-sourced inputs. Previously, he held operational roles in Western Europe Cement, Latin America and South East Asia for Lafarge.
On his election as President of CEMBUREAU, Hoddinott stated, "Being elected to serve the cement industry of Europe is a privilege and honour. I am keenly looking forward to working with the whole sector to build on the foundations laid by Ignacio Madridejos over the past two years. Specifically, this involves actions to reinforce and strengthen the sector in the face of its current challenges."
"I take this opportunity of thanking Ignacio Madridejos for his commitment to the Association over the last two years" said Koen Coppenholle, CEMBUREAU Chief Executive. "I also wish to thank the Association of the Austrian Cement Industry, VÖZ, for organising this latest CEMBUREAU General Assembly. As highlighted by the European Cement Research Academy (ECRA), there are several innovation initiatives in the pipeline, and I look forward to progress in this field over the next decade."
The perils of emissions trading schemes for the cement sector
16 January 2013This week Donal O'Riain, the Irish chief executive of Ecocem, cried out for an 80% tax on cement producers in Ireland. His reason? In his words, Irish producers are making profits from an over-allocation in the European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) despite demand dropping in the Irish industry. The tax was his suggestion to address this 'anomaly' and give the Irish Exchequer a boost.
The timing of his comments are interesting given that the EU ETS entered its third phase at the start of 2013. Towards the end of 2012 environmental campaign group Sandbag questioned in a report whether the scheme was actually helping the environment or not. As Sandbag pointed out generally, not just for the cement industry, carbon prices in the scheme had remained low due to an excess supply in the market. Due to the oversupply, prices were so low that the EU ETS has ceased to function.
The European Commission conceded this failing of the EU ETS in November 2012 by announcing that it was taking steps to address the supply-demand imbalance of emission allowances in the scheme. Firstly 'back-loading' action volumes, revising the auction time profile and delay of the auctioning of 900 million allowances, came into effect from 1 January 2013. Secondly the Commission launched a debate on broad structural measures with a report on the carbon market.
Any emissions trading scheme can distort the market in unexpected ways. With regards to the cement industry, if O'Riain is correct, then parts of the Irish cement industry are making profit on carbon credits despite demand falling. Or, to put it as O'Riain did, the EU ETS may be subsidising environmentally-unfriendly plants at the expensive of more environmentally sensitive ones. Such as Ecocem we must presume. What would be really interesting here is to find out whether other European cement producing countries are also benefitting from over-allocation as demand falls, specifically in Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece.
Another distortion is that in the EU ETS, offsets generated from developing countries can be surrendered by companies in competing sectors in the EU, giving, in effect, a subsidy to competitors outside the EU. For example, as ETS schemes spread then staying outside of such regulation could prove profitable for cement exporters.
Koen Coppenholle the chief executive of CEMBUREAU, the European Cement Association, tackled this in his response to the European Commission's report, "It is essential that any further reduction of CO2 emissions above the targets agreed should remain conditional upon the conclusion of an international agreement between all major greenhouse gas emitting countries. This should be undertaken with a view to establish a global crediting scheme, characterised by a comparable methodology to measure greenhouse gas emission reductions and equivalent monitoring and reduction efforts." Hence the interest in regional Chinese ETS schemes such as the emissions trading schemes that were launched in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong in 2012. China currently plans to introduce its own national scheme in 2015.
Despite the bureaucrats' efforts to improve emissions trading schemes, Petroleum Review summed up their effect in June 2012, "Carbon trading appears to have pulled off the noteworthy achievement of uniting oil and gas producers and environmentalists in their appraisal of its shortcomings." We could add cement producers to that list.
New Chief Executive for Cembureau
04 July 2012Europe: Koen Coppenholle took over as the new Chief Executive of Cembureau on 1 July 2012. He follows Dr Jean-Marie Chandelle, who retired at the end of June 2012.
Following a distinguished legal career, Koen Coppenholle has been Head of European Affairs for ArcelorMittal in Brussels since November 2007. Between September 2000 and November 2007, he was Senior Counsel European Affairs with General Electric Europe in Brussels. Coppenholle joined the Cembureau team on 2 April 2012 to help to ensure a smooth transition.
Jean-Marie Chandelle has held the position of Chief Executive of Cembureau since 1996. A qualified lawyer, with a Master of Law and a PhD, Chandelle has held numerous positions in his native Belgium and abroad.