Displaying items by tag: Tarmac

UK: Martin Riley has been appointed Senior Vice President of Tarmac. He will report to Ken McKnight, President Europe Heavyside. Riley was previously Managing Director, Aggregates and Asphalt at Tarmac. The appointment is part of the transition of the businesses acquired from Lafarge Holcim into the European Heavyside business of CRH.

In addition, the Tarmac Cement and Lime business will integrate into a new CRH business cluster consisting of UK Cement, Ireland and Spain, led by Oliver Mahon, Senior Vice President, who will also report to Ken McKnight. As part of this reorganisation the former CEO of Tarmac since 2013, Cyrille Ragoucy, will leave the business.

The news that Holcim and Lafarge are planning a merger should come as no great surprise to long-term observers of the industry. Such mega-mergers have been periodically mooted over the decades and have already come to pass.

Lafarge took its present form through many acquisitions, but it was the mega-merger with Blue Circle Industries that brought it to pre-eminence. That deal was hard fought, rapidly becoming a hostile takeover after the then-CEO of Blue Circle, Richard Haythornthwaite, decided that the amount that the CEO of Lafarge, Bertrand Coulomb, was offering for his company was not high enough.

A year of claims, counter-claims, offers, rebuffs and haggling ensued, leading to a higher offer that was eventually accepted by the Blue Circle board. However, as Lafarge was a Euro-denominated company and Blue Circle was resolutely British (and was thinking in UK pounds sterling) after exchange rate variations had been taken into account, Lafarge paid less after a year than it had offered in he first place. The British CEO got a big pay-off and went on to greater glory, having appeared to extract a great deal more money (in GB pounds) for his shareholders. Apparently they teach this as a case study in business schools.

Mega-mergers have also shaped other giants in the industry. For example Chichibu-Onoda and Sumitomo-Osaka came together to make Taiheiyo Cement and Ciments Français was added to Italcimenti, although in this last case they still retain their separate identities. Often the deals amount to an accretive takeover by one larger company of a smaller one, but transformative deals consisting of a 'merger' of 'equals' also happen in the cement industry, and with good reason. The merging of research efforts; the optimisation of management; the rationalisation of procurement strategies: all of these will immediately save plenty of money.

However, it's on the financial side that these larger merged companies can sometimes see the most benefit. The cost of borrowing money is inversely proportional to the size of the company (and of the sums involved); the colossal sums demanded by overpaid and greedy bankers will diminish in proportion if the sums involved are larger. So, the cost of borrowing money to be able to invest in takeovers or for capital expenditure will reduce as a proportion of overall cost.

There are other significant potential savings as well, from operational synergies, although these can be harder to quantify and - critically - harder to retain once the competition technocrats have run their slide rules over the proposed deal. They generally do not like too much of the market ending in the hands of too few players.

A good case in point is the recent mega of Tarmac and Lafarge in the UK. To allow the deal to take place the merged company was obliged to sell off one of its key assets, the Hope cement plant, which is now owned and operated by newcomer Hope Construction Materials. Even after the deal has been completed, the market regulator is considering the possibility of making the merged company sell additional facilities, something that strikes Global Cement as 'just not on.'

However, with operations in 90 countries, Lafarge and Holcim can expect to face competition scrutiny in at least 15 countries including Brazil, Canada, Ecuador, France, the UK, the US, Morocco and the Philippines. Meanwhile, in Serbia it has been reported the two companies have a combined market share of 97% across all their business lines!

Lafarge and Holcim have overlapping facilities and distribution networks in a number of countries, and any merged company will probably be required to sell some of them to its competitors. Other companies might be licking their lips at the prospect, as usual CRH is already being lined up in the Irish press, but the units will be sold at a market rate - and not a penny less. It might be that the merged company cannot control which facilities are sold, meaning that they might end up with a less than optimised system. Not so good after all.

If the deal goes through, it will create a Europe-based behemoth with a production capacity of over 200Mt, enough to retain a place on the global top 10 companies with the ever-rationalising and concatenating Chinese companies. When the news first broke we asked what might the new company called? We liked a short mash-up of the two names, like Lolcim (a humorous nod to today's 'youth-speak' perhaps) or Hafarge. However, the level of preparation backing the merger plan soon became clear from financial due-diligence right down to a new name: LafargeHolcim.

Yet for all this co-ordinated work from companies that were meant to be competitors until as recently as March 2014, we should remember what happened to the proposed BHP Billiton-Rio Tinto takeover. Valued at a high of US$170bn it shrivelled up as the global economy collapsed in 2008 amidst concerns from regulators. The idea may be out there but LafargeHolcim has a long way to go before it actually exists.

UK: Lafarge and Anglo American have appointed the chairman, chief executive office (CEO) and CFO of their joint-venture in the UK. Jamie Pike is appointed as non-executive Chairman, Cyrille Ragoucy as CEO and Guy Young as CFO of the joint-venture. The appointments are subject to the completion of the joint-venture and final clearance from the UK Competition Commission. It is anticipated that the joint-venture will commence operations in early 2013.

Jamie Pike, aged 57, is the non-executive chairman of Lupus Capital, a leading international supplier of building products to the door and window industry, RPC Group, a leading international supplier of rigid plastic packaging and MBA Polymers, a private US plastics recycling business. He was chief executive of Foseco, an international business serving the foundry and steel-making industries, until its acquisition by Cookson Group in April 2008. He led the buy-out of Foseco from Burmah Castrol in 2001, which culminated in flotation on the main market in 2005.

His early career was as a consultant with Bain and Co and A T Kearney before joining Burmah Castrol in 1991. He rose to chief executive of Burmah Castrol Chemicals before leading the Foseco buy-out. Pike was educated at the University of Oxford, holds an MBA from INSEAD and is a member of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers.

Cyrille Ragoucy, aged 56, is currently senior vice president for Health and Safety at Lafarge. From 2005 to 2009 he was CEO and regional president for Lafarge's cement operations in China (Lafarge Shui On Cement) where he was responsible for 25 plants and 10,000 people. Between 1999 and 2005 he was regional president for Aggregates, Concrete, Asphalt and Paving for Lafarge in Eastern Canada. Ragoucy joined the Lafarge group in 1998 as vice president Cement Strategy for Lafarge North America.

Guy Young, aged 43, has been CFO of Tarmac since 2010 with responsibility for Tarmac's financial, IT and legal operations as well as the pre-integration planning for the joint venture. Guy has been with Anglo American for 15 years in a variety of roles, including CFO of Scaw Metals, Group Procurement and within the CEO's Office. Guy was educated at the University of Cape Town and qualified as a chartered accountant after doing articles at Deloitte.

Back in May 2012 we asked who would buy Lafarge's Hope cement plant in Derbyshire. The answer was, of course, a company with an Indian background: Mittal Investments.

The sale was a condition of the UK Competition Commission in response to the proposed joint venture between Lafarge and Tarmac. It also included 172 ready mix concrete plants, five aggregates quarries, two asphalt plants, one marine aggregates wharf, one rail-linked aggregates depot and the sale of Tarmac's 50% ownership interest in Midland Quarry Products. Mittal has paid Euro339m for the assets, including up to Euro37m dependent on the performance of the assets over the next three years.

At the time we predicted that it might be a company from a fast growth area, with excess cash and a desire for technical knowledge, perhaps from China or the Middle East. Far more fitting for the UK, however, was a company with Indian roots, especially considering the cultural links between the two countries dating back to the colonial era.

Originally from India but based in London, owner Lakshmi Mittal runs steel multinational ArcelorMittal and he frequently tops UK rich lists. The Mittal family even own shares in Premier League football team Queens Park Rangers. The sale follows acquisitions of well-known British brands such as car manufacturers Jaguar Land Rover and British Steel/Corus to the Tata Group.

The sale to Mittal leaves the UK cement market with four companies. Mittal's new plant in the UK joins Lafarge's four plants, Cemex's two plants, Hanson Cement's three plants and Tarmac Buxton, Lime & Cement's single plant, which is soon to join with Lafarge's plants in the joint-venture. Geographically the sale to Mittal breaks up a concentration of three Lafarge and Tarmac plants in Derbyshire in the southern Pennines. Presumably this was the aim of the Competition Commission in the first place.

Selling the Hope plant makes sense for Lafarge and Tarmac. The sale leaves Lafarge's generous spread of plants across the UK in key locations except the south of England. The combined cement production capacity of Lafarge and Tarmac will fall from 4.35Mt/yr to 3.85Mt/yr. The reduction may actually help Lafarge, given its 9% fall in cement sales volumes so far in 2012 and the pessimistic outlook for the UK cement sector in 2013. The reduction in capacity manages this decline closely at 11%.

The UK cement industry has likely become more competitive with the range between the production capacities of the four companies reduced. However the price Lafarge and Tarmac have paid the Competition Commission for their joint venture was almost certainly worth it. Lafarge-Tarmac retains Lafarge's dominant position in a streamlined shape now matching the market reality.

Update: This article was corrected on 27 November 2012. The UK temporarily has five cement producers until the Lafarge-Tarmac joint venture gains approval from the UK Competition Commission. Then it will return to four.

UK: If Tarmac and Lafarge go through with their proposed JV tie-up in the UK, Lafarge will be obliged to sell its long-established Hope plant in Derbyshire, in the heart of the Peak District National Park, as well as its top-quality limestone quarry and rail depot connections. The Competition Commission has indicated that it would like an 'outsider' to buy the package, which also includes significant other assets in aggregates and readymix. The question is, who might be interested to buy it?

The UK is now a mature market, which has contracted significantly over the last decade, so that heady growth is not a possibility. The competition authorities will ensure that there is real competition in the UK building materials markets, so that only 'normal' margins of 5-10% can be expected - rather than inflated cartel-like or oligopolistic margins of 20% and beyond. Given that the return on capital invested is going to be quite low, why would anyone want to commit their cash (or their credit) to buying into the UK construction materials market? Why not put your money into bio-tech, or telecomms or even into a micro-development bank in the developing world?

I guess that it is largely down to a calculation of risk versus reward (as usual). The rewards of investing in a cement plant and integrated building materials business in the UK may be (relatively) low, but then the risks are also low: the UK is a fairly safe bet for long-term moderate growth, with strong population growth and robust GDP per capita.

Who would buy? A company that wants to balance its portfolio (perhaps a company with most of its eggs currently in the fast-growth/developing world basket), is cash rich (or has access to cheap credit), which is already in cement and aggregates and which might wish to carry home some of the technical knowledge from the deal might be interested. Perhaps some of the Chinese state-owned enterprises or ambitious mid-tier companies from the Middle East would be interested. As ever though, whether a deal is done depends on the price asked - and in the end, the price asked might be too high for anyone.