Global Cement News

The rumours were confirmed yesterday when the UK’s Breedon Group announced its acquisition of Ireland’s Lagan Cement. The price was Euro527m, which Breedon will finance with a combination of a new loan, extended credit and an equity placing. The assets it will gain include a cement plant in Kinnegad, nine active quarries, 13 asphalt plants and nine ready-mixed concrete plants.

Breedon said that its strategy is to continue buying businesses in the heavyside construction materials market. At a stroke, once the deal completes on 20 April 2018, it becomes an international company. From the cement perspective it gains a new 0.7Mt/yr plant in central Ireland and a terminal in Belfast, UK. The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) wasn’t mentioned in Breedon’s press release on the purchase but it seems unlikely that the competition body would have much to say on the transaction. Lagan Cement does hold ready-mix concrete (RMX) plants, aggregate and asphalt assets in Northern Ireland but these are far away from Breedon’s operations in mainland Britain. That said, the CMA did force Breedon to sell 14 RMX sites when it bought Hope Construction Materials in 2016. Generally speaking, Breedon’s enlargement reduces the diversity of the UK cement industry on the smaller end leaving only Quinn Cement, with operations on both sides of the border, as the country’s sole remaining single site clinker producer.

Aside from geographical expansion, becoming an international building materials company may offer Breedon Group some security from the UK’s exit from the European Union (EU) (so called Brexit). Breedon will join CRH as the only two cement producers with production facilities in both the UK and Ireland. The strategic significance of the position Breedon and CRH are in geographically may arise from whatever deal is reached between the EU and the UK and the significance of the UK’s only land border with the EU. LafargeHolcim is nearly in this club with its plants in England and Northern Ireland and plenty of the other local producers straddle the UK-EU border with terminals or production facilities elsewhere. Yet, in an uncertain Brexit negotiation, having kilns on both sides of the line might come in handy once (or if) the politicians make a decision.

Although, if Liam McCaffrey, the chief executive officer of Quinn Industrial Holding, is to be believed, then Brexit will have little impact at all other than (low) tariffs in a worst case scenario. He said to local press that although damage to the construction industry might arise in the UK from a prolonged recession, the UK’s housing shortage and reliance on imported building materials would probably see it through. That point about a possible financial downturn is important to Breedon Group, given the new debt it will be taking on to pay for acquisition. This is something that will be familiar to Breedon’s competitor Cemex. It is still paying off the debts from its acquisition of Rinker in 2007.

Breedon has decided to delay the release of its interim results from mid-July to September 2018 to allow time for the integration of Lagan into the group. Its sales and earnings may dwarf those from 2017 that it described as ‘one of the most productive years’ in its history. In the meantime congratulations are in order for Breedon Group for ensuring that the UK cement sector is never dull.

US: Dan Harrington has been appointed as the head of Cementir Holding for its North America region. He will lead Cementir's newly formed Region North America, which comprised of the North American cement production and distribution operations of Lehigh White Cement and the group's existing US concrete products company, Vianini Pipe.

Harrington was previously the president and chief executive officer of Lehigh Hanson North America and he has served as the chairman of the Portland Cement Association (PCA). He holds a science degree from Pennsylvania State University, an MBA from Fairleigh Dickinson University and an MA and PhD in executive management from Claremont Graduate University.

UAE: Ashley Bryan has been appointed as the general manager of Pioneer Cement. He will report to Joey Ghose, the chief executive officer of the parent company Raysut Cement. Bryan, aged 49 years, started working the cement industry in 1988. He has held various engineering and operational roles in the UK, Nigeria and South East Asia.

India: Burnpur Cement has appointed Pawan Pareek as its chief financial officer. Pareek holds 30 years experience in accounts, finance and commerce for the steel and cement industries.

The cement producer has also appointed Uma Agarwal as a non-executive independent director. Agarwal holds qualifications as a company secretary and has practiced company law for the last three years.

Two reports out this week have looked at the carbon footprint of the cement industry. The first, a technology roadmap by the Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI) and the International Energy Agency (IEA), laid out a technology pathway for the sector to reduce its direct CO₂ by 24% from current levels by 2050 to meet the IEA’s 2°C scenario (2DS). The second, a report by the CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project) on the progress of 13 major cement producers to reduce their emissions, was a progress report on the business readiness for a low carbon economy transition.

Graph 1: European Union industry emissions by sector, 2013 - 2017. Source: Sandbag, European Commission.

The scene was set last week when the environmental campaign group Sandbag picked up on the latest emission data from the European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Industrial emissions as a whole rose by 2% year-on-year to 743Mt in 2017. The cement and lime industry reported a rise of 3% to 148Mt in 2017 from 144Mt in 2016. As Sandbag reported, industrial emissions have remained ‘stubbornly high’ for the duration of the ETS. It then went on to say that, “the EU urgently needs a new industrial strategy to bring about radical industrial process changes and/or carbon capture and storage, especially for the high-emitting steel and cement sectors.”

The CDP’s report provided a global scorecard on the readiness of the cement industry to adapt to a low-carbon future. Unfortunately, the report used data from self-reporting questionnaires and it lacked data from the two largest Chinese cement producers, Anhui Conch and China National Building Materials (CNBM), although it did try to compensate for this. The CDP assessed companies across four key areas aligned with the recommendations from the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

Graph 2: Opportunity vs. risk for low-carbon transition. Source: Building Pressure report, CDP.

Surprisingly, the study, even with its limitations, found regional variation. As can be seen in Graph 2, the Indian cement producers came out on top from the criteria used: transition risks, physical risks, transition opportunities and climate governance and strategy. CDP pinned this on better access to alternative materials such as fly ash and slag coming from other carbon intensive sectors, such as thermal power generation and steel production. Reported process emissions measured by the clinker ratio for the Indian companies was 69% versus 78% for the other companies. They also benefited from newer cement plants driven by high market growth in the region compared to older plants in Europe.

The technology roadmap from the CSI and the IEA set out key actions for the industry to take by 2030 to have at least a 50% chance of achieving the 2°C 2DS scenario followed by a possible transition pathway that could be achieved through technology, legislation and investment. The key actions are protecting carbon pricing mechanisms from carbon leakage, putting new technology into action and supporting it by legislation, and greater government support for products with a lower clinker factor.

The CSI’s and IEA’s targets for 2030 included reaching a clinker to cement ratio of 0.64 in 2030 from 0.65 in 2014, a thermal energy intensity of clinker of 3.3GJ/t from 3.5GJ/t, an electricity intensity of cement of 87kWh/t from 91kWh/t and a alternative fuel co-processing rate of 17.5% from 5.6%. Perhaps the most optimistic is a CO₂ capture and storage amount of 14MtCO₂/yr in 2030 from nothing at the moment. This last target seems unlikely to be achieved given the lack of projects outside of the pilot stage, but it’s not impossible.

This column barely touches on the detail within either report or even the latest data from the EU ETS. Both reports offer ways forward to meet the 2°C global warming target outlined in the Paris Agreement. It’s easy to be pessimistic given the on-going clash between environmental optimism and business logic but both reports offer a way forward. The CDP report sets out a baseline with a look to the future, whilst the CSI/IEA roadmap offers what it says is a realistic route to reach that 2DS target. Lastly, if the CDP’s assessment is correct about the Indian producers then it’s possible that other developing cement industries may inherently be cleaner due to their use of newer plants and equipment. If worldwide government support can be provided for use of alternative fuels and materials on a much larger scale, as well as all the other recommendations, then meeting the Paris agreement may be easier than expected as new markets build new production capacity.

Two examples of carbon capture utilisation and sequestration projects will be covered in the May 2018 issue of Global Cement Magazine