Displaying items by tag: CRH
CRH confirms continued interest in India
04 January 2013Ireland: CRH chief executive Myles Lee has confirmed that the building materials group is interested in expanding its presence in India. The comment follows rumours from the Indian media that CRH and Holcim are both in separate talks with the Shriram Group to buy a stake in Sree Jayajothi Cements (SJJCL).
Lee said that CRH remained interested in expanding its presence in India, but declined to comment on Sree Jayajothi. CRH 'terminated' negotiations with Jaypee Cement Corporation in October 2012 because the parties were unable to agree terms.
"We have been on the lookout for a partner for quite some time and we keep having several discussions with different players both strategic and financial," said T Shivaraman, managing director and chief executive of Shriram Engineering and Procurement Company, which owns SJJCL. He refused to comment on the involvement of either CRH or Holcim. It has been reported that private equity giants Blackstone and KKR are also in separate preliminary talks with Shriram about its stake in the cement manufacturer. SJJCL owns a cement plant with a production capacity of 3.2Mt/yr based in Andhra Pradesh.
The rumours arrived at the same time that CRH announced it had made acquisitions and investments valued at Euro630m in 2012. The bulk of the money was spent in the US, where Euro256m was spent in the second half of the year. In Europe CRH spent Euro119m in the second half of 2012 in acquisitions in Finland and the UK. Lee confirmed that CRH holds between Euro1bn and Euro1.5bn to spend on deals.
Both CRH and Holcim have a combined capacity of around 61Mt/yr in India. Holcim controls ACC and Ambuja Cements while CRH has a venture with Hyderabad-based My Home Industries, which owns a 4.2Mt/yr plant.
Vertical rumour mill: Jaypee Group takeover tales
05 December 2012Step forward UltraTech Cement into the vertical rumour mill! The Indian cement producer is the latest company reported as wanting to buy Jaypee Group's cement business in Gujarat. It follows Italcementi, Aditya Birla and CRH, who announced in October 2012 that negotiations had been 'terminated' as the parties had been unable to agree terms.
This time the asking price has risen, with Ultratech allegedly offering US$160-165/t and Jaypee holding out for US$180-185/t. Whilst UltraTech hasn't publicly confirmed the move, it pointedly hasn't denied it either. The Aditya Birla Group subsidiary only commented to the Bombay Stock Exchange that it had not issued any press releases on the subject. Aditya Birla Group itself was reported in October 2012 as pursing interest at US$130/t for Jaypee's 9.8Mt/yr operations in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.
Given the number of rumours and cash-rich CRH's very public failure to strike a deal it seems likely that Jaypee has a specific price in mind and it's sticking to it. Prasad Baji of Edelweiss Securities stated in a television interview with CNBC-TV18 that he thought that the cement industry cycle was starting to look up. Crucially he predicted that India's capacity utilisation was set to rise from its current level of 78% to 82% despite price declines in the current quarter.
This is in sharp contrast with Fitch Ratings which rated the Indian cement industry with a negative outlook at the start of 2012 and reports in late May 2012 that capacity ultilisation had actually fallen from 76% to 71%. Since then ICRA Research reported in late September 2012 that it expected Indian capacity ultilisation to stick to 76% for 2012 with prices showing 'resistance' in some regions to cost increases due to rising input costs.
With all this in mind it seems likely that UltraTech will join the growing list of Jaypee's spurned buyers when it fails to reach terms or when the rumours simply fizzle out. However if UltraTech does strike a deal the Indian industry will be the one to watch in 2013. According to data in the Global Cement Directory 2013, an acquisition of nearly 10Mt/yr production capacity would boost UltraTech's capacity to 62Mt/yr making it the 12th largest cement company in the world.
Aditya Birla revives Jaypee deal
24 October 2012India: Business conglomerate Aditya Birla Group has revived negotiations to purchase cement manufacturer Jaiprakash Associates' cement plants in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh.
Aditya Birla is reported to have made an offer of up to US$130/t to buy the cement assets of Jaiprakash Associates which have an overall capacity of 9.8Mt. This follows Irish building materials firm CRH decision to cancel talks with Jaiprakash Associates in early October 2012. In August 2012 CRH was reportedly close to buying a 51% equity stake in the Indian cement producer's plants in Gujarat. Top officials from Aditya Birla's cement business and executives from foreign lender Barclays Bank are in talks to finalise the pricing of the deal.
CRH terminates Jaypee acquisition
09 October 2012Ireland/India: International building materials group CRH has said that negotiations with Jaypee Cement Corporation have been terminated because the parties were unable to agree terms.
On 7 August 2012 CRH announced that it had entered into talks with Jaypee regarding the possible purchase by CRH of an equity stake in Jaypee's Gujarat cement business. The operations in Gujurat consisted of clinker plants with a total capacity of 3.6Mt/yr. There are also two cement grinding plants with a total capacity of 2.8Mt/yr.
CRH to cut 50 jobs in Ireland
04 September 2012Ireland: Irish Cement, a CRH subsidiary, intends to cut 50 jobs at its Castlemungret plant due to a decline in demand for cement. Management has opened talks with workers and unions on a restructuring programme. Irish Cement has been in production at the Limerick site since 1938.
"Management at Irish Cement has met with employees at the company's manufacturing facility at Castlemungret in County Limerick. The company advised workers and union representatives that the unprecedented deterioration in market conditions, combined with a sustained decline in the demand for cement products, have led to the need for a significant restructuring plan to be put in place at the Limerick facility," said a company spokesman.
According to the release the move follows almost five years of decline in the Irish construction industry, with activity now nearly 80% below peak levels in 2007. Currently there is little visible indication of any market improvement in the foreseeable future.
CRH expects stagnant earnings for 2012
15 August 2012Ireland: CRH expects the Eurozone's economic problems to deepen a slide in sales in the second half of 2012, preventing it from raising profits despite a recovery in the US construction market.
For its interim results for the six months ending on 30 June 2012 the Irish building materials group reported a 5% rise in sales revenue, to Euro8.59bn from Euro8.17bn in the same period in 2011. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) fell by 1% to Euro568m from Euro574m.
"The big question is whether Germany and some of the economies that are performing well can compensate and continue to deliver growth for the Eurozone overall," said chief executive Myles Lee.
"We just don't see how the Eurozone can get their act together in time to have a significant impact in the second half," chief financial officer Maeve Carton added.
Sales in the US, where CRH is the leading producer of asphalt for highway construction, rose 8% on a like-for-like basis in the first half compared with a 5% drop in Europe where bad weather added to governments' debt problems. But CRH noted that the rate of economic growth in the US is tailing off and forecast that sales growth in the second half in the region will be 'well below' the 8% sales growth in the first half.
First-half results were propped up by favourable weather conditions and improving construction markets in the US, with revenue, profit and margin growth across all three of its divisions in the first-half, said CRH. The company said that key European markets such as the Netherlands continue to struggle, while it is expecting a contraction in sales in Poland in the second half of 2012.
The company is seeking to cut costs by more than Euro2bn over a five-year period in response.
How much is an Indian cement plant worth?
08 August 2012Anyone need a spare cement plant? If so then it looks like India is the place to head to this week.
First, Italcementi denied that it was in talks with Jaiprakash Associates to buy one of their Jaypee Cement plants. Then, after much speculation, CRH announced publicly that it had entered negotiations to purchase an equity stake in Jaypee's entire cement business. In addition the Indian government has also revived a plan to sell six Cement Corporation of India (CCI) factories that have been closed for almost 10 years.
All of this raises a question: how much are Indian cement plants actually worth?
According to one source, Italcementi was thought to be offering US$100/t (installed capacity) in the bid it supposedly made but has denied making. Jaypee 'wanted' US$150/t. However analyst commentary with the CRH announcement suggested that Jaypee's asking price was too high! This is hardly surprising. Back in June 2012 when Jaiprakash announced that it was selling its plants it was reported that Holcim was offering up to US$160/t. Alongside the CCI story an analyst was quoted as putting the cost of Indian cement production capacity at US$110/t-US$120/t. Yet these plants have been shut for a decade.
Unlike in Europe, Indian cement industry profits have been rising in double digits in recent years. However, input costs like energy and transport are rising and they are starting to hit margins listed in quarterly reports. Serious additional costs have also arisen from the anti-cartel fines issued by the Competition Commission of India. Throw in questions on infrastructure raised by last week's nationwide power-cuts and Italcementi's (non)decision to stick to US$100/t seems prescient.
Unlike Italcementi however CRH has money to spend. Back in June 2012 it was reported that the company had Euro1.5bn to invest. With Euro250m gone in the first half of 2012 on so-called 'bolt-on' acquisitions that still leaves plenty in the pot to pick up the CCI plants. Now that would be a surprise.
CRH seeks stake in Indian cement maker Jaypee
08 August 2012Ireland/India: International building materials group CRH has confirmed its entry into negotiations to buy an equity stake in Indian producer Jaypee Cement Corporation. Jaypee Cement owns three cement facilities in the Indian state of Gujurat, in the west of the country, and another in Andhra Pradesh, in the south-east.
CRH said in a statement that the operations in Gujurat consist of clinker plants with a total capacity of 3.6Mt/yr. There are also two cement grinding plants with a total capacity of 2.8Mt/yr. Jaypee Cement is India's third-largest cement maker.
"The completion of any transaction would be subject to satisfactory due diligence, the approval of the respective boards of directors and the granting of regulatory approval," said CRH.
CRH chief executive Myles Lee said at the group's AGM in May 2012 that the company was focused on opportunities in China and India in order to drive long-term growth. CRH has spent close to Euro250m on bolt-on acquisitions in the first half of 2012. This included a further equity injection into its China associate Yatai Building Materials. CRH first entered the Indian market in 2008 through a joint venture with My Home Industries, a cement maker in Andhra Pradesh.
Germany: Tomasz Czop, former Purchase Director of Ożarów Cement Poland (CRH Group) is now leading business development at MVW Lechtenberg & Partner, the German consulting firm for the implementation of alternative fuels from biomass and useable wastes in the cement industry.
As a former member of the management board of the Polish subsidiaries of Ireland's CRH he was directly responsible for the whole procurement of all business units in Poland and Ukraine. Within MVW Lechtenberg he will lead the business unit of alternative fuels and raw materials trade which is currently focused on the supply of refuse derived fuels for the cement and power generating industry in northern and eastern Europe.
CRH - swimming against the tide
06 June 2012Spend, spend, spend has been the advice for CRH this week. The suggestion by an industry analyst this week that Irish building material conglomerate CRH should go on a shopping spree seems almost perverse! Or at least like stockbrokers trying to drum up excitement.
Just as all of the big multinational cement producers are selling assets and tightening management structures to cope with the ongoing financial turmoil, CRH is the only player that hasn't ruled out acquisitions in 2012. The analyst from Dublin stockbroking firm Davy predicted that CRH could spend up to Euro3.5bn on acquisitions while remaining within its banking agreements; a more level-headed figure was given as Euro1.5bn.
CRH broke down its revenue in 2011 to 55% to the European divisions and 45% to the American ones, with European Distribution, Americas Materials and European Materials being its top three sections. European Materials, the worldwide division containing cement assets generated Euro2.99bn, 16.5% of total group revenue.
With 85% of CRH's European Materials division concentrated on Switzerland, Finland, Benelux, Eastern Europe, Turkey and Asia its exposure to the Eurozone economic slowdown has been reduced compared to the competition. Yet what to buy next is fraught with risk. If Greece exits the Euro for example, then there may be some bargains going, but how long it would take these assets to become profitable is a big unknown.
Similarly, the over-indebted Mediterranean countries present opportunities and challenges. CRH's decision to transfer its 49% holding in Portuguese cement joint venture Secil to Semapa in May 2012 may indicate CRH's intention to stay well away from the Eurozone until the dust settles. Given the amount of cash that CRH could potentially throw around however, it seems odd that the company didn't try to disrupt the ongoing Cimpor takeover by two Brazilian firms. If anything happened to the bid by Camargo Corrêa and Votorantim then CRH would be in a prime position to benefit should it wish.
Whatever CRH decides to do with its money, it's a good problem to have! Lafarge, Cemex, HeidelbergCement and Holcim must all wish they had the same dilemma.