Displaying items by tag: Merger

India: LafargeHolcim’s subsidiaries ACC and Ambuja Cement have started exploring the options for a merger. The cement producers have initiated a study to assess the benefits of the move. A special committee of directors, of which the majority are independent directors, has been constituted to commence the evaluation. The boards of both companies will make a decision once a recommendation is received from the special committee of directors and the Audit Committee.

Germany: Loesche has merged its activities in the combustion systems and drying systems sector into a central location at their main centre under the name Loesche Thermal Applications. Alongside the established hot gas generators, the business incorporates combustion systems for solid, liquid and gaseous fuels as well as complete drying systems for a wide variety of industrial applications, including the cement industry.

By uniting the core competencies in the thermal applications sector, the Loesche group seeks to strengthen its market position. Pooling marketing, project management, purchasing, processing technology and proactive development together with an individual burner test facility at the in-house test centre are also intended to raise efficiency. The business reorganisation will also see the merger of Loesche with A Tec Greco Combustion Systems Europe, a subsidiary that is currently based in Austria.

South Africa: AfriSam is preparing to replace its chief executive officer (CEO) to aid its merger discussions with PPC. Rob Wessels, a former chief investment officer at AfriSam’s black empowerment partner Phembani Group, is set to replace current Stephan Olivier on a short-term contract, according to sources quoted by Boomberg. The personnel manoeuvring would also potentially place PPC’s current CEO Darryll Castle in a strong position to become the merged company’s new leader. PPC and AfriSam announced that they had resumed merger talks in February 2017 after a previous attempt stalled in 2015.

The merger between South Africa’s larger cement producers, PPC and AfriSam, is back on this week. PPC issued a statement advising its shareholders that the board of directors of both companies were about to enter formal talks to thrash out a potential deal. Issues such as the merger ratio, black economic empowerment and local competition concerns are all on the agenda.

The resumption of merger talks follows the cancellation of the previous round in mid-2015. No reason for the breakdown was publicly released but possible factors may have included the fallout at PPC from the resignation of its chief executive officer (CEO) Ketso Gordhan and competition concerns. Given the investigations by the South African Competition Commission from around 2008 to 2012 these may have been very real concerns. At this time the two companies held about a 60% share of the country’s cement production capacity.

Events have changed since then with the opening and ramp-up of Sephaku Cement’s cement plant at Aganang and its grinding plant at Delmas since late 2014. Today, PPC and AfriSam control just under 50% of the cement production capacity in South Africa and PPC’s current CEO Daryll Castle remains in post since early 2014. What a difference a year or so can make.

PPC moved its financial year end from September to March in 2016 making it hard to compare like with like. However, its revenue appears to have grown by 10% year-on-year to US$396m for the six months to 30 September 2016. Its earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), a measure of operating performance, fell by 7.5% to US$80m at the same time. Since then PPC notified markets with a trading statement saying that its sales volumes in South Africa had risen by 4% in the nine months to the end of December 2016 but that its prices had fallen by 4%. It also noted that its local cement sales volumes declined marginally when compared to the same quarter in the previous year, with the exception of the Western Cape region.

PPC also has various projects underway in sub-Saharan Africa, including plant builds in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Ethiopia. Of note to any potential merger with AfriSam are its plans to build a new 3000t/day production line at its Slurry plant in Lichtenburg. The project was reported 54% complete in early February 2017 with first clinker production scheduled for the first half of 2018. CBMI Construction, a subsidiary of China’s Sinoma, is the main contractor for the upgrade project. Once complete the new line will add about 1Mt/yr to the plant’s cement production capacity. One implication of this project is that it will push PPC and AfriSam’s market share over 50% that may have consequences with the local competition body.

For its part AfriSam appears to be suffering financial problems according to local press. The Public Investment Corporation (PIC), a government investment body, revealed in late 2016 that it had invested over US$100m in the cement producer since 2008. The PIC holds a controlling share of AfriSam with a 66% stake in the group. Other than this, solid facts about the state of AfriSam’s business are thin on the ground. However, competition in South Africa’s cement sector has certainly increased in recent years both within and without, from the import market.

As this column has said a few times merger and acquisitions seem to be the way to go for cement producers in weak markets. However, as annual results from Cementir and HeidelbergCement show this week, the initial boost from new asset and business purchases may not be so rosy when viewed in a pro-forma basis or when taking into account new units’ past performance. A lot here rides on these companies being able to take advantage of synergy effects and to make crucial savings. The big example of this in the global cement sector is LafargeHolcim. It will announce its financial results for 2016 on 2 March 2017. It also operates a cement plant in South Africa and the results may have implications for the PPC and AfriSam merger.

In other news, the European Union parliament has voted today, on 15 February 2017, to amend its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) in line with a proposal made by the European Commission. This is unlikely to impress the environmental lobby or users of secondary cementitious materials in cement production, amongst other parties. More on this topic next week.

South Africa: PPC and AfriSam have resumed talks to discuss merging the companies. The cement producers will prepare an assessment on the proposed merger and then report back to their respective shareholders and boards. AfriSam previously proposed a merger with PPC in late 2014 before talks were called off in mid-2015. At that the time the two cement producers controlled about 60% of the local market.

Germany: HC Trading and Interbulk Trading have merged their operations to form HC Trading, following the acquisition of Italcementi by HeidelbergCement. The merger will continue the group’s international trading activities, specialising in cement, clinker, coal and petroleum-coke by expanding the trade network and improving its position in the market. The total turnover of the new trading company will be around US$1.4bn.

“We trust that, by having an enlarged geographic reach as well as an expanded product portfolio, we will be able to further enhance our efficiency to better serve the market and our business partners,” said Emir Adiguzel, the chief executive officer of HC Trading. He added that the group intends to use idle capacity from former Italcementi plants to meet demands from import facilities in Africa, North America and South East Asia.

India: Dalmia Bharat and OCL India have agreed to merge creating the fourth largest cement producer in the country with a production capacity of 25Mt/yr. Dalmia Bharat already owns a 75% share in OCL and the merger has been described as a move to ‘simplify the ownership’, according to Puneet Dalmia, managing director of Dalmia Bharat Group, in comments to the Economic Times.

“The merger will simplify the holding structure and create further consolidation in the cement sector,” said Dalmia. “This action further strengthens our position as one of the leading cement players in India, uniquely placed to support India’s economic growth, and demonstrates our commitment towards achieving simplification and consolidation.”

As mentioned last week, there were a number of big news stories, one of which was the planned merger between RHI and Magnesita. On 10 October 2016 both companies announced that they were combing to form a ‘leading’ refractory company with complementary assets and a completion date penned in for 2017. As Informed’s Mike O’Driscoll presents a good overview of the two companies and the general implications of the merger we will focus on the cement industry aspects of the merger here. It is worth noting here that the new company will be established in the Netherlands but its shares will be listed in London. O’Driscoll reckons that had the UK voted to stay in the European Union the new company would have been based in London.

Comparing like-with-like for RHI and Magnesita is difficult because Magnesita doesn’t publish figures on its refractory sales to the cement industry. However, RHI produced 443,000t of refractory materials in 2015 for its Industrial Division, including the cement and lime industries, and Magnesita produced 151,000t for its Industrial Division at the same time. As can be seen in Graph 1 RHI produces nearly three times as much refractory as Magnesita in this area. Sales volumes for RHI have fallen over the last five years and Magnesita’s sales hit a high in 2013. Total revenue for RHI, across all business lines, was US$1.95bn or about double that of Magnesita.

Graph 1: Refractory sales volumes to industrial divisions for RHI and Magnesita, 2011 – 2016. Sources: RHI and Magnesita financial reports. Note: Figures for Magnesita are calculated from percentages.

RHI reported that 12.6% of its revenue in 2015 came from the cement and lime industries. It pointed out that this sector of its business benefited from the growing construction industry in North America. Elsewhere, it had a tough time in most of its territories, with the exception of Indonesia where its revenue grew due to a major contract won in the lime segment. Over the last five years RHI’s revenue from its cement and lime customers dipped to a low in 2013 before recovering year-on-year since then.

However, the situation has deteriorated during the first half of 2016 with revenues from the cement and lime industries falling by 13% year-on-year. China was blamed as the biggest single factor, with business down by roughly a quarter as a result of the downturn in the construction industry, falling property prices and lower investment activities. One interesting point that RHI made at this time was that, “the globally weak economic situation and regional excess capacities are causing a decrease in repair volume.” Another was the importance the refractory producer placed on Africa and on Nigeria and Algeria in particular. This seems to belie the petrodollar woes Nigeria has experienced recently and the scaling back by Dangote Cement of its international expansion plans.

Magnesita reported that sales volumes for its industrial segments sector, including cement, dropped by 11.7% year-on-year to 133,000t in 2016. It blamed the shortfall on the declining cement industry in Brazil with problems in Venezuela also contributing. In contrast to RHI though it reported growing sales in the Middle East and Africa, notably in Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Sales revenue actually rose by 10.2% to US$145m due to favourable exchange rates on sales outside of Brazil.

In the first half of 2016 the negative trend in Brazil continued for Magnesita with sales volumes falling by 22% in its so-called ‘established’ markets. This was compensated for by Bolivia, Mexico, Argentina and the Middle East, Africa and the Commonwealth of Independent States territories. Sales volumes for its industrial segments sector rose slightly by 1.1% to 75,200t in the first half of 2016. Again, sales revenue grew on the back of exchange rates.

As with mergers between large producers in the cement industry, if global growth is stagnating, then mergers offer an alternative way for refractory companies to compensate. However, LafargeHolcim’s promise of savings and synergies has withered to periodic news bulletins of what assets the group is planning to sell next. One question to pose is whether the merger of RHI and Magnesita will herald a similar drip-drip of assets disposals in coming years or whether it will usher in a new era for the refractory industry. A large part of this will depend on the health of the steel industry, as well as minority markets such as cement.

Austria/Brazil: RHI and Magnesita are to merge to create a new refractory company called RHI Magnesita. RHI’s management board has agreed to sign a share purchase agreement with Magnesita’s controlling shareholders regarding the acquisition of a controlling stake of at least 46%, but no more than 50% plus one share of the total share capital of Magnesita, pending RHI’s supervisory board approval. The purchase price for the 46% stake will be paid in cash amounting to Euro118m and 4.6 million new shares to be issued by RHI Magnesita. The new company will be established in the Netherlands and listed on the London Stock Exchange.

As pat of the agreement, GP Investments (GP) will become a relevant shareholder of RHI Magnesita. The combined company’s corporate governance will consist of on a one-tier board structure while GP will be represented on the board of directors.

The deal is dependent on approvals by the relevant competition authorities, the migration of RHI to the Netherlands, the listing of RHI Magnesita’s shares in the premium segment of the Official List on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange and RHI’s shareholders not having exceeded statutory withdrawal rights in an amount of more than Euro70m in connection with organisational changes preceding RHI’s migration from Austria. The migration and the preceding organisational changes in Austria require qualified approval by RHI’s shareholders’ meeting. If the deal is terminated for reasons not under the control of Magnesita’s controlling shareholders, an aggregate break fee of up to Euro20m is payable by RHI to Magnesita’s controlling shareholders.

The merger transaction is expected to complete in 2017. Until then, the two companies will remain completely separate and independent. Therefore customers, suppliers, employees and other stakeholders should expect no change in management teams, commercial relationships, supply chains and product offerings during this period.

RHI and Magnesita say that the new refractory company will bring together complementary businesses, both in terms of products and geographical footprint. Magnesita have a presence in South America and the US compared to RHI’s presence in Europe and Asia. The merger is also expected to aid the company’s position against the growing Chinese refractory industry. In addition, Magnesita’s position in dolomite-based products is complementary to RHI’s asset portfolio, which traditionally has a strong focus and an excellent market reputation for high-quality magnesite products.

Synergies from the merger are expected to deliver at least Euro36m in earnings before tax (EBIT) by 2020. However, if RHI Magnesita’s stake in Magnesita significantly exceed 46%, RHI expects substantially higher synergies of approximately Euro72m, especially in the areas of enhanced production efficiency and cost benefits in research and development, marketing and administrative functions. In addition, capital expenditure synergies are expected to amount to be Euro2 – 7m/yr and aggregate working capital savings of Euro40m are expected in the coming years.

Canada: The board of directors of Italcementi have met in Milan, Italy and have decided on integrate its operations in the Canadian market with the operations of HeidelbergCement, which from 1 July 2016 has been holding the majority stake in Italcementi and will take over the entire company following a mandatory takeover bid. The transaction involves the acquisition by Canadian Lehigh Hanson Materials (LHM), indirectly owned by HeidelbergCement, of the entire share capital, including ordinary and preference shares, of US-based Essroc Canada, which is indirectly owned by Italcementi, through vehicle company Essroc Netherlands. The price which Essroc will receive for the sale of Essroc Canada to LHM, equal to some US$281m, will be paid by assigning to Essroc 42,288 LHM shares of the new issue, or 15.5% in LHM share capital, and for the remainder - in cash US$151,000.