Displaying items by tag: UltraTech Cement
The battle for Binani Cement
04 April 2018Persistence has paid off for UltraTech Cement this week. Although the deal is not complete, all the signs are pointing towards India’s largest cement producer buying Binani Cement despite losing an auction for it last month. Here’s a recap of what has happened so far.
In July 2017 the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Kolkata, a semi-judicial body that rules on issues relating to companies, started insolvency proceedings for Binani Cement. It followed a plea by one of the cement company’s creditors, the Bank of Baroda, that had an outstanding claim of around US$15m. The Kolkata bench of the NCLT rejected Binani Cement’s argument that the debt was tiny compared to the assets of its parent company Binani Industries of US$2.15bn. It then appointed an administrator, or resolution professional, called Vijaykumar Iyer, a partner at Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India. More on him later on.
The subsequent auction of Binani Cement raised lots of interest both internationally and locally due to its production base. The company operates a 4.9Mt/yr plant at Binanigram in Rajasthan with two kilns and four mills. It also runs a 1.4Mt/yr cement grinding plant at Sirohi in the same state. Unusually though for an Indian producer it also runs a 2Mt/yr grinding plant at Jebel Ali, Dubai in the UAE and a 0.5Mt/yr integrated plant, Shandong Cement, in China.
Its products domestically in India include 43 and 53 grades Ordinary Portland Cement and Portland Pozzolana Cement, with the Bollywood film star Amitabh Bachchan as its brand ambassador. On that last point the Indian Supreme Court chastised Binani Cement in 2014 for not paying sales tax in Rajasthan whilst being able to hire Bachchan! However, given the ferocity of the struggle to buy Binani Cement maybe all that marketing of the brand paid off, giving the producer a much higher profile than it might otherwise have had.
Anyway, lots of companies showed interest in Binani Cement in the first round of bidding in late 2017. CRH, LafargeHolcim, HeidelbergCement, India Cement, Orient Cement, Ramco Cement, Shree Cement, UltraTech Cement and Piramal Group were all linked to the auction. Eventually UltraTech Cement, JSW Cement, Ramco Cement, HeidelbergCement India, Dalmia Bharat and a pair of Indian investors all submitted bids and JSW Cement emerged as the winner with a bid of US$919m. However the emergence of an additional liability of around US$250m scuppered that auction when it turned out that Binani Cement had offered a corporate guarantee for the acquisition of a fibreglass asset in Europe known as 3B in 2012 by Binani Industries. By February 2018 the next auction was in progress and this time Dalmia Bharat Cement and UltraTech Cement led the race. Dalmia Bharat won the second auction with a bid of around US$1.03bn made in a consortium with Bain Capital’s India Resurgent Fund and Piramal Enterprises.
At this point the situation might have conceivably slowed down. Instead, UltraTech Cement kept on fighting and queried the entire bidding process. It then made a direct offer of US$1.11bn to Binani Cement in the form of a so-called ‘comfort letter’ that Binani Industries used to stop the insolvency process. At the same time it received approval from the Competition Commission of India in its bid for Binani Cement, the previous absence of which was one of the reasons its bid against Dalmia Bharat was rejected.
Indian company law now faced a dilemma over how a bankruptcy works given that the NCLT was meant to be in charge. A way out was found though when the NCLT in Kolkata and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal both allowed the bidders to settle the dispute ‘amicably.’ To add further confusion the administrator Vijaykumar Iyer also alleged right in the middle of the final tussle between Dalmia Bharat and UltraTech Cement that fraudulent transactions had been made by Binani Cement! Whether this has any further implications remains to be seen.
At this stage nobody is likely to declare UltraTech Cement the winner of Binani Cement until it actually picks up the keys to the cement plants. Perhaps not even then in case of any lingering legal issues! UltraTech Cement clearly views Rajasthan as a growth area given the tenacity with which it has gone after Binani Cement. It operates two integrated plants in the state and is building two more of its own. After its long journey in buying plants from Jaiprakash Associates in 2017, UltraTech Cement is starting to look like the cement producer that simply won’t take no for an answer.
India: The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has allowed the companies fighting to buy Binani Cement to ‘amicably’ settle the dispute. The tribunal was hearing a petition filed by Binani Industries, which holds over 90% of Binani Cement, according to the Press Trust of India. It followed a suggestion by the National Company Law Tribunal of Kolkata that also asked Binani Cement to consider taking an out-of-court offer between the cement producer and its lenders.
A consortium led by Dalmia Bharat won an auction for Binani Cement with a bid of US$974m in early March 2018. However, UltraTech Cement then made a direct bid to Binani Cement a few weeks later.
UltraTech Cement receives approval from Competition Commission of India on bid for Binani Cement
29 March 2018India: UltraTech Cement has received approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) regarding its bid for Binani Cement. It said that the Committee of Creditors (COC) of Binani Cements had rated Bharat Dalmia as the leading bidder instead of UltraTech Cement because it didn’t have clearance from the CCI. “A lot of apprehensions were raised by the resolution professional about UltraTech obtaining the CCI clearance, on its bid for Binani Cements,” said UltraTech Cement in a statement.
India: National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) of Kolkata has asked Binani Cement to consider taking an out-of-court offer between the cement producer and its lenders. The NCLT has asked the committee of creditors (COC) to take up a proposal by Binani Industries, the parent of Binani Cement, to pay off all lenders' dues for 'appropriate consideration', according to the Economic Times. Binani Industries had approached the NCLT, seeking to stop insolvency proceedings after getting a ‘letter of comfort’ from UltraTech Cement, which proposed to pay US$1.11bn to help Binani pay off its debts and buy a 98.43% stake in the company.
The decision appears to pave the way for UltraTech Cement to win the on-going fight for control of Binani Cement. A consortium led by Dalmia Bharat won an auction for Binani Cement with a bid of US$974m in early March 2018. UltraTech Cement then made its direct bid to Binani Cement a few weeks later.
Consultant alleges fraud at Binani Cement
21 March 2018India: Vijaykumar Iyer, a resolution professional with Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India working for Binani Cement, has alleged that fraudulent transactions have taken place involving the promoters of the company. Iyer made an application in mid-March 2018 to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Kolkata asking the court to take action and ‘appoint an appropriate investigation agency to investigate the directors of Binani Cement and the counter parties,’ according to the Economic Times. Sources quoted by the newspaper say that the application is likely to receive a hearing imminently. Binani Cement has denied the allegations.
Iyer’s application said that he had appointed Haribhakti & Co as a ‘forensic consultant’ in November 2017 for reviewing and identifying ‘suspect’ transactions. He said that since the inception of the corporate insolvency resolution process, he had not been provided access to all the required information and documents. He alleges that Binani Cement made several payments to ‘potentially related and/or connected customers and entities,’ such as Saraswati Sales (SSPL) and US$75.4m was outstanding at the end of November 2017, suggesting that sales were made to SSPL despite the fact that corresponding payments were not made to the corporate debtor. Other inconsistencies were also found suggesting that money was being removed from the business without paying outstanding debts.
Dalmia Bharat beat UltraTech Cement in a bidding war to buy Binani Cement for US$974m in early March 2018 in an auction was run by the National Company Law Tribunal under insolvency proceedings. However, UltraTech Cement has since made a US$1.11bn bid directly to Binani Cement to stop the insolvency process. UltraTech Cement has said it is ‘shocked’ by the allegations by Iyer and that it was unaware of any pending investigations when it made its latest offer.
India: UltraTech Cement has made a new US$1.11bn bid directly to Binani Cement in order to buy it. Binani’s parent company Binani Industries is independently seeking to stop the insolvency proceedings of its cement subsidiary using the money offered by UltraTech Cement in a so called ‘comfort letter.’ In a statement UltraTech Cement said it had in principle agreed to buy 98.5% of the shares of Binani Cement.
However, a consortium led by Dalmia Bharat won an auction for Binani Cement with a bid of US$974m in early March 2018. The auction was run by the National Company Law Tribunal under insolvency proceedings. Binani Cement has since complained that the bidding process was not run on a transparent process, according to the Economic Times newspaper. It added that the ‘shortcomings’ in the insolvency process had prompted the company to look at other options. The on-going struggle by UltraTech Cement and Dalmia Bharat is expected to test local bankruptcy law.
India: The Ministry of Coal has cancelled Jaypee Cement’s coal block at Mandla in Madhya Pradesh citing breach of agreement. In a letter the ministry said that the cement producer was ‘not serious about the development of the coal mine,’ according to the Business Standard newspaper. The ministry has accused Jaypee Cement of switching the plant using coal from the mine without permission and of exceeding the agreed output.
The Mandla coal mine was allocated to Jaypee Cement in March 2015 after a bidding process. At first it supplied Jaypee’s Balaji cement plant in Andhra Pradesh. However, production from the mine switched to the Shahabad cement plant in June 2017 following the acquisition of the Balaji plant by UltraTech Cement.
2017 for the cement multinationals
07 March 2018HeidelbergCement’s acquisition of Italcementi really sticks out in a comparison of the major multinational cement producers in 2017. Both its sales revenue and cement sales volumes jumped up by more than 10% year-on-year from 2016 to 2017. It still puts HeidelbergCement behind LafargeHolcim and CRH in revenue terms but the gap is shortening. Although, as we reported at the time of its preliminary results in late February 2018, on a like-for-like basis its sales and volumes only rose by 2.1% and 1.1% respectively.
Graph 1: Sales revenue from multinational cement producers in 2016 and 2017 (Euro billions). Source: Company financial reports.
The European markets may be back on their feet but serious growth came from mergers and acquisitions. Along the same lines, India’s UltraTech Cement is set to reap the reward of its US$2.5bn acquisition of six integrated cement plants and five grinding plants from Jaiprakash Associates in mid-2017. Although as can be seen in graphs 1 and 2 it had been doing fairly well even before this.
Graph 2: Cement sales volumes from multinational cement producers in 2016 and 2017 (Mt). Source: Company financial reports.
We’ve included Ireland’s CRH this year to present the scale of the company. When it says that it is the world’s biggest building materials company, it means it! CRH doesn’t publish its cement sales volumes, which makes it hard to compare it to other cement producers. In part this may be due to the company’s regional-focused structure and its approach to the construction industry. In Global Cement Magazine’s Top 100 Report 2017 – 2018 feature, CRH was placed as the seventh largest cement producer by installed capacity with 50.5Mt/yr. The major story with CRH in recent years has been its steady stream of acquisitions, notably Ash Grove Cement in the US in 2017.
LafargeHolcim may remain the biggest cement producer in the world outside of China but it made an income loss of Euro1.46bn in 2017. At face value its cement sales volumes fell by 10.2% to 210Mt in 2017 from 233Mt in 2016 but this was mainly due to divestments in China, Vietnam and Chile. On a like-for-for-like basis its volumes rose by 3.3%. To this kind of mood music the emphasis on the release of its 2017 results this week was the announcement of a five-year plan to refocus the company. However, reports of overcapacity in Algeria that also emerged this week suggest the group may have its work cut out.
Cemex described 2017 as a ‘challenging year’ as its operating earnings fell due to a lower contribution from the US and South America despite growth in Mexico and Europe. Hurricanes in Florida had a negative impact in the US and the Colombian market suffered from falling production in 2017. UltraTech Cement uses a different financial year to the other companies detailed here, which makes comparisons a little harder. However, its profit after tax fell in the third quarter that ended on 31 December 2017 due to rising costs of petcoke and coal. Undeterred though, its expansion drive continues this week with its continued efforts to try and win the bid for Binani Cement. Vicat, meanwhile, reported falling earnings in part due to the poor market in Egypt. Yet overall its sales and volumes rose in 2017 aided by recovery in France. Finally, Buzzi Unicem rode out the Italian market with its acquisition of Zillo Group delivering a rise in sales and cement volumes.
Wider trends are hard to call given the differing geographical spreads of these cement producers. Europe has been recovering from a decade of stagnation and Asian markets are no longer reliable. South America is mixed with places like Brazil, and now Colombia, underperforming. Yet Argentina is proving one of the fastest growing construction markets at the moment with local plants unable to meet demand. Africa remains profitable and promising as ever but divided between the north and the Sub-Saharan region.
Once the effects from mergers and acquisition activity by the larger cement producers start to fade then the actual situation may become clearer. In the meantime, the effects of the recent cold snap in Europe on the first quarter results for 2018 could be pretty varied. The Financial Times newspaper, for example, quoted one pundit from the Construction Products Association who estimated the industry lost 1% of its annual output to the bad weather in the UK. This may not be great news for any company relying on the European market.
UltraTech Cement fights rejected bid for Binani Cement
07 March 2018India: UltraTech Cement is querying the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) why its bid for Binani Cement had been rejected. The auction for the bankrupt Binani Cement was won by a consortium consisting of Dalmia Bharat and Bain Capital’s India Resurgent Fund and Piramal Enterprises, according to the Business Standard newspaper. UltraTech Cement is questioning how the bid selection process was conducted.
Although JSW Cement won the first round of bidding, the NCLT decided to ask for more bids. Bidders were then informed that their bids would be assessed using a weighted system that would consider each company’s background, experience and upfront cash to be paid to the secured lenders.
India: Dalmia Bharat Cement and UltraTech Cement have each submitted bids of around US$930m for Binani Cement. The amount also includes upfront cash payments, as well as an offer of close to 20% stake in Binani to lenders, according to sources quoted by the Hindustan Times. A winning bid is expected to be chosen by the end of February 2018.
Both bidders have been asked for additional details related to their bid to allow the creditors to make their final decision. UltraTech Cement, for example, has been asked to provide information on a Competition Commission of India (CCI) penalty imposed upon it in 2016.