Global Cement News
Search Cement News
JK Lakshmi Cement posts US$2.27m net loss for the second quarter of its 2016 fiscal year 06 November 2015
India: JK Lakshmi Cement has posted a standalone net loss of US$2.27m for the second quarter of its 2016 fiscal year, which ended on 30 September 2015, down from US$4.66m in the same period of its 2015 fiscal year, due to an additional burden of interest and depreciation cost on commissioning of the new Durg cement plant. Its standalone income rose by 13% year-on-year to US$98.2m during the quarter. The company said that its sales volume and prices were both impacted by subdued market conditions.
Boral benefits from higher sales prices 05 November 2015
Australia: Boral chief executive Mike Kane has said that higher product prices are playing a part in the strong performance of its key businesses so far in the 2015-2016 fiscal year. He noted that cement prices were up in New South Wales and southeast Queensland but steady elsewhere.
"Based on the first quarter results, we are seeing an improvement in year-on-year results. The business is consistent with our expectations this year," Kane told shareholders at Boral's AGM. "Price is playing a role in our performance, as well as cost management. On average, we think prices will move up, but we will have more clarity on that as we get through the half year."
The company has experienced lower demand from roads, engineering and major infrastructure projects so far in the 2015 – 2016 fiscal year, but has responded by reducing costs and pushing through a number of surplus property sales.
Qatar National Cement profit slightly up 05 November 2015
Qatar: Qatar National Cement Company (QNCC) has reported that its profit for the nine months ending on 30 September 2015 was US$98.6m, compared to US$91.2m in the same period of 2014. This represents a year-on-year rise of 8.1%. Revenue for the nine months to 30 September 2015 was US$233m, compared to US$212m for the nine months to 30 September 2014, a rise of 9% year-on-year.
The company's gross profit for the nine months to 30 September 2015 was US$96.2m, compared to US$93m for the same period of 2014. QNCC's other income for the nine months to 30 September 2015 was US$10.8m, compared to US$6.5m for the same period of 2014.
Paraguay: Although the Paraguayan state-run cement company Industria Nacional del Cemento (INC) has announced that it has secured the supplyof 50,000bags/day and is importing cement from Brazil, local distributors are still voicing their discontent with the firm. They they claim that INC is lying about the volumes that it provides. They are also complaining that the cement it imports is of poor quality and that the cement coming into the country from Brazilian producer Votorantim is too expensive.
Additionally, they argue that the imported cement is just to compensate the lack of supply from INC. They specifically complained that there were practically no regular disbursements of cement over the week beginning 26 October 2015. They believe that there is a lack of clinker for cement production and that demand from the local market is not being covered.
The head of INC, Jorge Mendez, has categorically denied the claims, stating that the distributors are making objections due to the fact that a recent negotiation process between INC and them has come to an end. He stated that 270,000 bags were handed over to distributors during the aforementioned week, including around 45,000 bags of cement produced by INC, and over 20,000 bags from imports. He feels that the issue has arisen because a certain number of distributors do not like the fact that construction firms buy imported cement and that INC regulates cement prices. Mendez has also challenged claims that Paraguay's distributors are requesting more cement.
Tricky times in India
Written by Peter Edwards
04 November 2015
The past week has seen several quarterly financial results from producers in the world's second-largest cement industry: India. So far, they do not make for a great read from an economic perspective, although some players, including Birla Group and Sanghi Cement are yet to show their hands.
So let's kick off. For the quarter that ended on 30 September 2015, LafargeHolcim subsidiary Ambuja Cements saw its net profit slide by 36% year-on-year to US$23.6m compared to the same period of 2014. Its income fell by 4% to US$324m as it battled a one-off charge. ACC, LafargeHolcim's other Indian subsidiary, saw a profit of US$17.5m for the quarter, a year-on-year fall of 40% compared to 2014. Not great for the global number one player.
Other players to announce so far have included JK Cements, which reported a 58% fall in consolidated net profit to US$2.1m. Meanwhile, Century Textiles, which owns Century Cement, fared even worse. It actually posted a loss compared to a marginal profit in 2014, despite an increase in total income.
It has not been all doom and gloom however. UltraTech Cement, while it reported a drop in profit, was not as badly affected as the firms listed above. It recorded a 3.9% fall to a net profit of US$59.7m for the quarter, down from US$62.3m in the same period of 2014. This was reported as being better than expected according to a senior research analyst at Angel Broking, perhaps hinting at shaky ground under even these results.
So far, the exception to the lower profits and losses has been India Cements Ltd (ICL), which posted an almost five-fold growth in its net profit. It profit grew from US$1.14m to US$6.26m, which it said stemmed mainly from improved operating parameters and substantial reductions in its variable costs. Its operating profit grew to US$35.4m from US$27.9m. It expects performance to improve as it increases its capacity utilisation rate up, currently languishing at just 60%.
Does the company provide a model for other producers to follow? Perhaps. The company's managing director and vice-chairman of ICL, N Srinivasan, said that the company was poised for improved conditions in its markets. In the company's results he said, "Going forward, we see better times ahead. We had a tough time for two years and have achieved a turnaround by cutting costs and maintaining a healthy cement price." The fact that ICL has managed to 'maintain a healthy cement price' in times of low requires scrutiny in a separate column.
However, a possible take-away from the results released so far is that the larger producers seem to have greater immunity to the problems surrounding over-supply in India. Economies-of-scale and the ability to spread risk around different Indian markets tends to favour larger players like UltraTech. Conversely, a smaller player that finds itself 'stuck' in one of the weaker regional markets, must just sit tight and weather the storm. Either that or it can make itself into a strategic acquisition target for one of the larger groups.
We are still awaiting results from other players in the Indian market, but with low demand, it would be foolish to expect them to be significantly different from the above. Given this, two key factors will help determine whether the decline in profits continues or not. Firstly, India's Modi government is promising large-scale infrastructure projects, which would help boost demand for cement. The industry has heard such promises in the past, however, and may chose to be skeptical. Secondly, it is important to remember that lower profits are being seen at the moment, even despite lower coal costs. Any upward change in these costs and the pace may become too fast for some of the country's smaller producers.